Comments on: Kernel 2.6.31-final released for Debian/Ubuntu (Final) http://blog.robertalks.com/index.php/2009/09/10/kernel-2-6-31-final-released-for-debianubuntu-final/ here I talk Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:37:46 +0000 hourly 1 By: robertalkshttp://blog.robertalks.com/index.php/2009/09/10/kernel-2-6-31-final-released-for-debianubuntu-final/comment-page-1/#comment-1531 robertalks Thu, 18 Aug 2011 20:03:01 +0000 http://blog.robertalks.com/?p=677#comment-1531 To be honest I can't confirm it. I haven't tested on that chipset the kernel, but I would suggest to move a bit upper with the kernel. Latest version are 2.6.29 and 3, but most probably would be better to upgrade Ubuntu. To be honest I can’t confirm it. I haven’t tested on that chipset the kernel, but I would suggest to move a bit upper with the kernel. Latest version are 2.6.29 and 3, but most probably would be better to upgrade Ubuntu.

]]> By: Henryhttp://blog.robertalks.com/index.php/2009/09/10/kernel-2-6-31-final-released-for-debianubuntu-final/comment-page-1/#comment-1530 Henry Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:38:08 +0000 http://blog.robertalks.com/?p=677#comment-1530 hi Robert, for months I have had frequent crashing of my 10.4 Lucid Lynx system due, I think, to my using an Intel i845 chipset. I have read that 2.6.31 is the newest version of Ubuntu that is compatible with my chipset. Before I try 2.6.31 can you confirm the above please? Regards, Henry hi Robert,
for months I have had frequent crashing of my 10.4 Lucid Lynx system due, I think, to my using an Intel i845 chipset. I have read that 2.6.31 is the newest version of Ubuntu that is compatible with my chipset. Before I try 2.6.31 can you confirm the above please?
Regards,
Henry

]]> By: ryazorhttp://blog.robertalks.com/index.php/2009/09/10/kernel-2-6-31-final-released-for-debianubuntu-final/comment-page-1/#comment-892 ryazor Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:26:15 +0000 http://blog.robertalks.com/?p=677#comment-892 Thanks, just works as expected. Thanks, just works as expected.

]]> By: BJBhttp://blog.robertalks.com/index.php/2009/09/10/kernel-2-6-31-final-released-for-debianubuntu-final/comment-page-1/#comment-696 BJB Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:47:10 +0000 http://blog.robertalks.com/?p=677#comment-696 Hello, Tried this kernel out (Debian SID 32 bit). Works great, seems marginally faster. I might now have the nerve to try EXT4 out. One issue with the image package is the binary firmware for the ATI Radeon chips is missing, and the package conflicts with Debian's firmware-linux package because some of the blobs are indeed there. Perhaps you could include all blobs in firmware-linux in the image package. One small issue I found with the header files is when I recompile the vmware modules it is missing arch/x86/Makefile_32.cpu. However if I untar your source .deb and symlink the header directory at it vmware compiles fine. Thanks again for your work! Hello,

Tried this kernel out (Debian SID 32 bit).

Works great, seems marginally faster. I might now have the nerve to try EXT4 out.

One issue with the image package is the binary firmware for the ATI Radeon chips is missing, and the package conflicts with Debian’s firmware-linux package because some of the blobs are indeed there. Perhaps you could include all blobs in firmware-linux in the image package.

One small issue I found with the header files is when I recompile the vmware modules it is missing arch/x86/Makefile_32.cpu.

However if I untar your source .deb and symlink the header directory at it vmware compiles fine.

Thanks again for your work!

]]>